On 17 May 2018, 14:29 +0200, José Valim <[email protected]>, wrote:
> Let's go with this proposal then: <+>, <->, <*> and </> with the same > precedence as the math equivalents. > I believe this might not be enough for the matrix library, because it would need to multiplications - for dot product and cross product. I think it planned to use regular * for dot product and <*> for cross product (or the reverse). But now the plan is to drop "raw" * and use <*> instead, this leaves the other product operator not accounted for. Should we go for something like <@> or maybe <x> for the other product operator? Michał. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/e68c7879-16ad-4d71-9e2a-0e93581c7cdc%40Spark. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
