On 17 May 2018, 14:29 +0200, José Valim <jose.va...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> Let's go with this proposal then: <+>, <->, <*> and </> with the same
> precedence as the math equivalents.
I believe this might not be enough for the matrix library, because it would
need to multiplications - for dot product and cross product. I think it planned
to use regular * for dot product and <*> for cross product (or the reverse).
But now the plan is to drop "raw" * and use <*> instead, this leaves the other
product operator not accounted for. Should we go for something like <@> or
maybe <x> for the other product operator?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.