Hi, I’m respectfully not convinced by your example. The first change seems wrong to me: processes don’t *need* to store state. They don’t have any needs, wills, regrets or feelings. It’s the developer that has a need to store state. The change seems inappropriate.
The second diff actually changes the meaning of the sentence IMO. It looks like it provides two things: an implementation and an API, as if the API wasn’t part of the implementation. I’m not convinced, it would make the docs less precise and harder to understand. My 2 cents of course :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/53ebe2d5-0cd2-4a31-88f6-e0aaf2851dfc%40googlegroups.com.
