Thank you for the examples.

However, I believe those examples are not really checking for a boolean,
but rather for nil. If you don't want to use is_nil, you can always compare
with nil, which is also pipeable:

    def has_access? do
      at_least_logged_in? and get_csrf_cookie(session) != nil
    end

    %{event_form | submitted: event_form.submitted_at != nil}

    case membership_ends_on || trial_ends_on || dues_exempt do
      nil -> add_error(changeset, :membership_ends_on, "is required")
      _ -> changeset
    end


On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 7:04 PM Bruce Tate <br...@grox.io> wrote:

> I support this feature. The arguments for
>
>
>    - a solution that composes well with pipes and
>    - the linters rejecting the most common solution of !!
>
>
> are all particularly good ones. From my perspective, I teach composition
> with pipes in the core, `with` in the boundary, and I try to have students
> return a boolean rather than a truthy result as part of good API design.
>
> The inability to convert from truthy to boolean has always felt like a
> missing feature to me.
>
> -bt
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:42 AM Andrea Leopardi <an.leopa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> What's the particular advantage of "to_boolean(term)" over "not
>> is_nil(term)"? That it supports also booleans, which however could be used
>> directly in predicates?
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 4:32 PM Moxley Stratton <
>> moxley.strat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here are examples:
>>>
>>>     def has_access? do
>>>       at_least_logged_in? and !!get_csrf_cookie(session)
>>>     end
>>>
>>>     %{event_form | submitted: !!event_form.submitted_at}
>>>
>>>     case !!(membership_ends_on || trial_ends_on || dues_exempt) do
>>>       true -> changeset
>>>       false -> add_error(changeset, :membership_ends_on, "is required")
>>>     end
>>>
>>>     case !!previous_value and !!new_value do
>>>       true -> put_change(changeset, :unconfirmed_email, new_value)
>>>       false -> changeset
>>>     end
>>>
>>>     submitted? = !!Ecto.Changeset.get_change(changeset, :submitted_at)
>>>
>>>     %{rsvpd: !!participation.rsvpd}
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:48 PM José Valim <jose.va...@dashbit.co>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can we revisit in which scenarios an explicit boolean conversion is
>>>> necessary?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 1:21 AM Moxley Stratton <
>>>> moxley.strat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like revisit this issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue was last discussed 5 years ago. Much has changed in that
>>>>> time. The given solution was to use a double-negative (!!) to convert a
>>>>> given value to a pure boolean.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here are the problems with the suggested solution:
>>>>> 1. I believe this solution is a hack that is not intuitive to
>>>>> beginners. It's rarely seen by mid and senior developers, meaning they 
>>>>> have
>>>>> to pause to interpret what !! means.
>>>>> 2. A double negative can't be part of an Elixir pipeline.
>>>>> 3. The Credo package warns about double negatives: "Double boolean
>>>>> negation found". Linters in other languages have a similar warning. Other
>>>>> languages have a built-in function (JavaScript has Boolean()) to convert 
>>>>> to
>>>>> boolean.
>>>>> 4. The alternative to double-negative is verbose: "if expr, do: true,
>>>>> else: false", or the less readable "expr && true || false"
>>>>>
>>>>> I would be happy to submit a PR to add Kernel.to_boolean/1.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 5:48:28 AM UTC-8 José Valim wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Not necessarily , but the ones in Kernel are. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *José Valim*
>>>>>> www.plataformatec.com.br
>>>>>> Skype: jv.ptec
>>>>>> Founder and Director of R&D
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/45dc9a7b-1657-4d02-933b-fe8fe182c2bcn%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/45dc9a7b-1657-4d02-933b-fe8fe182c2bcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>>> Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elixir-lang-core/KKqjMbXoIJA/unsubscribe
>>>> .
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>>> elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2B7iTRj%3Do62adGM%3DspKxnscAT1QoVC-0uqLDS_YPcDGAA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4%2B7iTRj%3Do62adGM%3DspKxnscAT1QoVC-0uqLDS_YPcDGAA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "elixir-lang-core" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAFJDP5fJWCVCU41R0CQWx-q6RD1ENUtw92bcpSunf6SBNfQtsg%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAFJDP5fJWCVCU41R0CQWx-q6RD1ENUtw92bcpSunf6SBNfQtsg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "elixir-lang-core" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAM9Rf%2BLMgPAwYN8FyEs0t%3DVvmAQzP9gx-VjykT6Q11Dvd%3DsVyA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAM9Rf%2BLMgPAwYN8FyEs0t%3DVvmAQzP9gx-VjykT6Q11Dvd%3DsVyA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tate
> CEO
>
>
> <https://bowtie.mailbutler.io/tracking/hit/f8218219-d2a8-4de4-9fef-1cdde6e723f6/c7c97460-016e-45fb-a4ab-0a70318c7b97>
>
> Groxio, LLC.
> 512.799.9366
> br...@grox.io
> grox.io
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "elixir-lang-core" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAFXvW-47q8nXAKw%2B8ZH_NHh2booBmEYtDf-dB70GHXPDXnZmXw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAFXvW-47q8nXAKw%2B8ZH_NHh2booBmEYtDf-dB70GHXPDXnZmXw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/CAGnRm4J5P%2BdmuOB94xq1L9poz7t8_sjQMub3nYGwrzEYYHgqAQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to