As of now, when you define a guard with `defguard` it adds the attribute: `@doc guard: true`, we could include guards that are defined with `defguard` and any other macros with this attribute set. Or we could introduce a new attribute for identifying guards, as @doc seems limited to documentation only.
`defguardp` are private so they wouldn't be available to be imported. On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 09:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Kenny Evitt <kenny.ev...@gmail.com> wrote: > So the `:guards` option would only import guard macros? > > Should this option also import guards that are NOT defined using > `defguard` or `defguardp`? > > On Monday, June 13, 2022 at 10:02:46 AM UTC-4 eksperimental wrote: > > > Hi, > > Currenly import/1 allows us to import :functions, :macros, :sigils > > with the :only option. > > I have found myself to manually have to list every guard I want to > > import from my "Util" module. This has been a recurring issue. > > > > I think it will be a good addition given the nature of guards that > > since they are macros they need to be required, plus usually you > > don't want to have the module name when you call the guard. > > > > What do you guys think? > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/62a76955.1c69fb81.d33d9.30f0SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.