Hmm. I always had the impression that fprof was the preferred way to benchmark code. Good to know.
-- Onorio On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:21 PM, José Valim <[email protected] > wrote: > The empirical proof was running fprof >> <http://erlang.org/doc/man/fprof.html>, an erlang tool "used to profile >> a program to find out how the execution time is used". >> > > To be fair, fprof should not be used for benchmarking because the > profiling hooks will affect code performance in different ways. For > example, if you are running code and then enables fprof, that same code > path may now take much longer. A benchmarking tool would be ideal here. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "elixir-lang-talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elixir-lang-talk/l-7rK9_bT2Q/unsubscribe > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/CAGnRm4%2BotB7niwyNFtbH_hZsw6ubw65ZXFKqVkfSdXXdCRg6VQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/CAGnRm4%2BotB7niwyNFtbH_hZsw6ubw65ZXFKqVkfSdXXdCRg6VQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Onorio Catenacci http://onor.io http://www.google.com/+OnorioCatenacci -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-talk/CAP%3DvNq9wfCxs9xJM3QFtxGOydSRfmnUpvu2o15dcCkzi-raPmA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
