You can use pipelines in Elm; in fact they are preferred. Somewhat 
handwavey example:

getAuthToken |> andThen getHomepage |> andThen doBackgroundStuff |> andThen 
showResultsOfBackgroundStuff

(Think of |> as a unix pipe.)

This proposal is about backticks. As background, a function that's a word 
(most of them) is prefix, and a function that's a symbol like + is infix. 
Backticks can make a (two-argument) prefix function infix, but it does so 
with the opposite argument order of |>. I think this is a reasonable idea, 
but not a drop-dead-amazing idea, which seems to be the bar for language 
changes.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to