One big focus right now is adding support for the rest of the Web Platform
to the standard library.

If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to the elm-dev mailing list to keep
abreast of what Evan is up to at the moment.

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 8:16 PM, John Bugner <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't mean to sound pushy, but if "That's what people are familiar
> with." is taken as a valid reason, then why not bring back 'atoi' and such
> names then? Why not make the syntax more JS-like? Why not just make Elm yet
> another imperative OO language?
>
> This is an opportunity for Elm to show that it takes seriously the task of
> making programming easier. The fact that the world of programming has for
> so long made itself arbitrarily difficult by having incomprehensible
> function names (among many other sins) is something that programmers should
> be ashamed of, not proud of.
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 11:34:45 PM UTC-5, Max Goldstein wrote:
>>
>> It's great that Elm can appeal to new programmers, but it's mainly
>> targeting web developers. As such, things like max/min, ||/&&, and "string"
>> are going to stick around. No need to reinvent what's been standard(-ish)
>> since C.
>>
>> The biggest name annoyance, IMHO, is *filter*. It doesn't immediately
>> convey whether you're selecting in or out. For my money, Ruby got this one
>> right: *select* and *reject*. They sound similar and they are similar,
>> and the names convey which way the predicate goes. I wouldn't be adverse to
>> stealing a few other Ruby or near-Ruby names; perhaps List.includes instead
>> of member, and reduce to replace foldl (dropping foldr and renaming it fold
>> could also work).
>>
>> That said, I'm not convinced much of this will happen. Evan is a "big
>> picture" guy, and this would break a lot of code, although deprecation
>> (having both copies for awhile) could help.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to