On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 5:25:45 AM UTC-6, Oliver Searle-Barnes wrote:
> See elm-mdl for example, what are your thoughts on the elm-parts approach? > I quite like the elm-mdl/elm-parts approach, very extensible. Do note that elm-mdl only uses elm-parts for parts that hold any kind of state (using 'render' as its view function call). If it is pure view then it does not use elm-parts (and uses 'view' as its view function call) in the general case. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
