In what ways are qualified imports at odds with safe code?

I think the opposite is the case: unqualified imports lead to less code safety. 

> Am 18.08.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Will White <[email protected]>:
> 
> I prefer safe code to qualified imports.
> 
> On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>> 
>>> "Qualified imports are preferred."
>> http://elm-lang.org/docs/syntax#modules
>> 
>> I try to avoid as much as possible importing everything from a module. 
>> If I would have IDE support for automatic imports I would never do a import 
>> Module exposing (..). 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to