You have to remember to qualify. On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:40:21 PM UTC+1, Janis Voigtländer wrote: > > In what ways are qualified imports at odds with safe code? > > I think the opposite is the case: unqualified imports lead to less code > safety. > > Am 18.08.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Will White <[email protected] > <javascript:>>: > > I prefer safe code to qualified imports. > > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote: >> >> "Qualified imports are preferred." >> >> http://elm-lang.org/docs/syntax#modules >> >> I try to avoid as much as possible importing everything from a module. >> If I would have IDE support for automatic imports I would never do a import >> Module exposing (..). >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
