You have to remember to qualify. On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:40:21 PM UTC+1, Janis Voigtländer wrote: > > In what ways are qualified imports at odds with safe code? > > I think the opposite is the case: unqualified imports lead to less code > safety. > > Am 18.08.2016 um 17:37 schrieb Will White <will.n...@gmail.com > <javascript:>>: > > I prefer safe code to qualified imports. > > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:11:21 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote: >> >> "Qualified imports are preferred." >> >> http://elm-lang.org/docs/syntax#modules >> >> I try to avoid as much as possible importing everything from a module. >> If I would have IDE support for automatic imports I would never do a import >> Module exposing (..). >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to elm-discuss...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
