I feel your pain, but note that the guidance - such as it is - now is not to have deeply nested elements. One option is to pass down in stages - e.g. pass it 3 levels down, and then 3 more
On Friday, 23 September 2016 17:02:01 UTC+2, Yosuke Torii wrote: > > I'd do like this. Not sure how deep it can do well though. > > https://gist.github.com/jinjor/2a26826bc0a1ed833146a7b29c6e3ab8 > > > 2016年9月23日金曜日 3時11分40秒 UTC+9 Umur Ozkul: >> >> I have a deep component hierarchy and subscriptions are needed by the >> components deep down. However subscriptions are handled by main. What is >> the best way to delegate the messages to responsible components deep in the >> hierarchy? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
