What do you mean by "taken seriously"? (I'm curious). rtfeldman/elm-css is phenomenal at, at the minimum, giving you type safe styling in Elm. (including pseudo selectors, etc.)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:51 AM suttlecommakevin < [email protected]> wrote: > I wish CSS was taken more seriously by Elm. > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/vvJGw1u7NVQ > > > On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 6:50:07 PM UTC-4, Peter Damoc wrote: >> >> Regarding 1. I don't see how the compiler can deduce that a certain union >> type you used was suppose to have the meaning of ID and another meaning of >> class >> >> One way you can do this manually is to specialize the namespace manually >> and then unpack it. >> >> namespace : Namespace String Classes Ids msg >> namespace = >> Html.CssHelpers.withNamespace "myApp" >> >> { id, class, classList } = >> namespace >> >> Regarding 2. You can generate the CSS on the fly and mount it into a >> style element in the head using ports. This will make sure that you will >> always have the latest version. >> You can take a look here: >> https://github.com/pdamoc/elm-powercss-proposal >> to see how that could be done. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> There is NO FATE, we are the creators. >> blog: http://damoc.ro/ >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
