On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:34 PM, suttlecommakevin < [email protected]> wrote:
> If you read through that thread you should be able to see what I mean. > IMO, if it was taken seriously, it would be supported as a first class > citizen. > I've read through the thread and it is not obvious what should change in order for you to be able to call it "first class citizen". CSS is a very complex topic/issue and elm-css is already doing the best it can be done in the field of direct porting of features found in CSS and the CSS preprocessors. If you want things to be different you need to come up with a compelling alternative that demonstrates how, if using your proposed solution, things will be considerably better. As someone who attempted an elm-css alternative, I can tell you that you need to think at least as hard as Richard did about elm-css otherwise you will gradually begin to understand why elm-css is implemented the way it is. Some of the implementation details are not obvious at the first look, nor at the second but they start to make a lot of sense when you try to come with an alternative solution. :) -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
