It's difficult to assess the performance anecdotally (benchmarks are preferred, see Evan's meticulous blog posts around Elm's performance relative to other languages/libraries/frameworks)
My view is that we don't need Polymer, just the web components standards. If you're deploying to production, that may means that you may need to serve browser poly-fills. Regardless, later phases of the Elm/Web Component experiment will have a few simple benchmarks. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Aislan de Sousa Maia < [email protected]> wrote: > I've heard scary things about Polymer performance, mainly on mobile > browsers. What you guys think about the state of Polymer at this time? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
