On Friday, October 7, 2016 at 9:43:40 AM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote: > > Yes, we just need web-components, not polymer. Polymer is prividing some >> convenience to experiment with web components though. >> >>> Well... it's more than just convenience. If this gets really iron out > and Elm programmers get easy access to the entirety of > https://customelements.io/ > this might make Elm a lot more attractive. >
customelements.io is all built on top of Polymer is it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
