Can you, please, provide an example? When I do a component (like one page of my SPA), I dedicate a module for it. So, how can look a flat structure? Just Shared.elm, Main.elm, Update.elm and View.elm?
Il giorno ven 21 ott 2016 alle ore 20:22 Wouter In t Velt < [email protected]> ha scritto: > +1 for the "better flat than nested " approach. > I think it was the second elm town podcast where Brian admitted that he > actually regretted his post. > > From personal experience (admittedly limited) I definitely agree to the > "flat is better than nested". Having one update function with helpers, and > not having any components with local state has made debugging at least 10x > faster for me. > > Adding features like an undo function was way easier with a flat structure. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
