Op maandag 24 oktober 2016 13:18:59 UTC+2 schreef Lars Jacobsson:
>
> Any thinking going out there on around naming conventions OOP vs
> functional? I'd be grateful for any input on this matter of life or death!
>
I always try to keep my naming conventions close to the Core functions.
E.g. in my Elm app, I have functions similar to yours. They are called
listUpdate and listInsert with the following signatures:
listUpdate : Int -> (RecordWithID a -> RecordWithID a) -> List (RecordWithID
a) -> List (RecordWithID a)
listUpdate index updatefunction list =
listInsert : Int -> RecordWithID a -> List (RecordWithID a) -> List (
RecordWithID a)
listInsert index newRecord list =
type alias RecordWithID a = { a | id : Int }
The names were inspired by Dict.insert and Dict.update, which were the
closest to what I was looking for.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
