> > Elm style puts the items last > Also, putting the item last lets you partially apply the rest of the function, so if you wanted to replace by ID on a bunch of items, you could do
List.map (replaceItemById id) someListOfItems. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Mark Hamburg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Elm style puts the items last so that you can write: > > items |> replaceItemById id item > > > On Monday, October 24, 2016, Lars Jacobsson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> | The names were inspired by Dict.insert and Dict.update, which were the >> closest to what I was looking for. >> >> Yeah, I'm probably just too used to that dot notation. >> >> >> I don't know why but >> items.replaceItemById id item >> looks better than >> replaceItemById items id item >> . Somehow it feels like a standalone function named "replaceItemById" >> won't give us a list in return. But taking your idea to heart this would >> then be something like itemsUpdateById >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
