I did a lot of work in ember myself, and I feel your pain, but this is still a 0.x product, and so it should be expected that some breakage is performed while we reach the best possible state of the language. It's different for Ember, which had a lot of breakage post 1.0.
tirsdag 25. oktober 2016 14.45.35 UTC+2 skrev James Hamilton følgende: > > I agree with your sentiment in principle. I suppose the underlying >> question is whether or not this is actually going to be such a benefit to >> future users of elm that it would be worth inconveniencing current users >> who want to upgrade. Personally I'm quite comfortable with foldr and foldl >> but I understand the foldLeft and foldRight are more expressive. >> > > I used to use ember and its constant churn drove me to find an alternative > which led me to elm. Not that the community elm behaves anything like ember > in this regard, but still this blog post > <https://medium.com/@frustrated_ember_developer/ember-js-another-year-of-churn-instability-and-festering-frustrations-4d01838361cb#.ha438hsub> > rather > sums up the danger of making a lot of inconvenient changes for apparently > abstract reasons. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
