That is a fair point, actually. I think the idea of aliasing the functions on 0.18 might be a good temporary measure which would allow the community to get used to the new function names without breaking any code and then the old ones can be removed in a later version.
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 2:56:16 PM UTC+1, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote: > > I did a lot of work in ember myself, and I feel your pain, but this is > still a 0.x product, and so it should be expected that some breakage is > performed while we reach the best possible state of the language. It's > different for Ember, which had a lot of breakage post 1.0. > > tirsdag 25. oktober 2016 14.45.35 UTC+2 skrev James Hamilton følgende: >> >> I agree with your sentiment in principle. I suppose the underlying >>> question is whether or not this is actually going to be such a benefit to >>> future users of elm that it would be worth inconveniencing current users >>> who want to upgrade. Personally I'm quite comfortable with foldr and foldl >>> but I understand the foldLeft and foldRight are more expressive. >>> >> >> I used to use ember and its constant churn drove me to find an >> alternative which led me to elm. Not that the community elm behaves >> anything like ember in this regard, but still this blog post >> <https://medium.com/@frustrated_ember_developer/ember-js-another-year-of-churn-instability-and-festering-frustrations-4d01838361cb#.ha438hsub> >> rather >> sums up the danger of making a lot of inconvenient changes for apparently >> abstract reasons. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
