Aliases could also remain forever, so people could choose which they prefer. However, this seems counter to the prevailing direction for Elm.
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 9:42:25 AM UTC-4, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote: > > I think aliasing would just push the problem further into the future. At > some point breakage would have to happen, there's no reason to not having > it being done right now. It's not like your code base will be any smaller > when the aliasing is removed. > > True, the change should be reflected in similar functions. Just like > library authors are encouraged to change the definition for andThen to be > used with pipes instead of backticks (requires arguments to be flipped). > > onsdag 26. oktober 2016 14.21.02 UTC+2 skrev Wouter In t Velt følgende: >> >> Op woensdag 26 oktober 2016 13:21:03 UTC+2 schreef Rupert Smith: >>> >>> Also worth pointing out that these libraries (and possibly others) have >>> adopted the convention of using a single 'l' or 'r' to mean from-the-left >>> and from-the-right: >>> >> >> And the List library also has a scanl function (no scanr), which - >> should some renaming of foldl happen - would be nice to keep consistent. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
