As someone barely literate in functional programming, and coming from javascript or ruby land, the thing that trips you up for a second is that it's not called reduce. Seeing two things named wordL and wordR, it's pretty clear for me what the difference between them might be.
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 5:21:02 AM UTC-7, Wouter In t Velt wrote: > > Op woensdag 26 oktober 2016 13:21:03 UTC+2 schreef Rupert Smith: >> >> Also worth pointing out that these libraries (and possibly others) have >> adopted the convention of using a single 'l' or 'r' to mean from-the-left >> and from-the-right: >> > > And the List library also has a scanl function (no scanr), which - should > some renaming of foldl happen - would be nice to keep consistent. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
