On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 3:12:53 PM UTC+1, Kasey Speakman wrote: > > So to phrase what I previously said a different way, a database is the > wrong level of abstraction to be shooting for. > Yes, I think you are right. Much better if we can just think about the data model we need, and have some completely automated way of persisting it.
I was just thinking, with reference to "Making Impossible States Impossible", typed functional languages have some appealing aspects as a foundation for describing data models. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
