On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 3:12:53 PM UTC+1, Kasey Speakman wrote: > > So to phrase what I previously said a different way, a database is the > wrong level of abstraction to be shooting for. > Yes, I think you are right. Much better if we can just think about the data model we need, and have some completely automated way of persisting it.
I was just thinking, with reference to "Making Impossible States Impossible", typed functional languages have some appealing aspects as a foundation for describing data models. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
