On Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:49:08 UTC, Max Goldstein wrote: > > What I meant was, Elm needs to choose differently from Haskell, at least > some of the time, or else there wouldn't be a reason for it to exist. And, > what seems weak and limited to one person can seem friendly and > easy-to-start-using to others. >
I think that was quite well put. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
