The Process documentation has a section on Future plans: http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-lang/core/4.0.5/Process
I believe actual parallelism in elm will take quite a while. Before it is implemented, the Elm community needs to think about “What would we use it for?” and use workarounds for a while. (E.g. do your heavy calculation in JS web workers and communicate over ports.) Probably Robin asked “What would you use it for?” because of that. (Or he wants to make sure you didn't get hit by the http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem) Am Sonntag, 13. November 2016 00:53:05 UTC+1 schrieb أحمد حبنكة: > > according to this > <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29181960/is-there-parallelism-in-elm> > question, > Elm doesn't support parallelism yet. > > > I know that right now the idiomatic way in JS (and in result Elm) is to do > concurrency instead of parallelism but I think in the future web workers > might become as idiomatic as AJAX or Promises. > > Given that JS does now support it via web workers, I was wondering what > are the plans for adding Parallelism to Elm ? > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
