Thanks for the answer :) بتاريخ الأحد، 13 نوفمبر، 2016 6:35:26 م UTC+2، كتب Rolf Sievers: > > The Process documentation has a section on Future plans: > > http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-lang/core/4.0.5/Process > > I believe actual parallelism in elm will take quite a while. Before it is > implemented, the Elm community needs to think about “What would we use it > for?” and use workarounds for a while. (E.g. do your heavy calculation in > JS web workers and communicate over ports.) > > Probably Robin asked “What would you use it for?” because of that. (Or he > wants to make sure you didn't get hit by the > http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem) > > > Am Sonntag, 13. November 2016 00:53:05 UTC+1 schrieb أحمد حبنكة: >> >> according to this >> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29181960/is-there-parallelism-in-elm> >> question, >> Elm doesn't support parallelism yet. >> >> >> I know that right now the idiomatic way in JS (and in result Elm) is to >> do concurrency instead of parallelism but I think in the future web workers >> might become as idiomatic as AJAX or Promises. >> >> Given that JS does now support it via web workers, I was wondering what >> are the plans for adding Parallelism to Elm ? >> >> >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
