Yup. It is just not used often enough to warrant special syntax. On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Witold Szczerba <[email protected]> wrote: > I think List.range is just fine. No need for special syntax and strange > function names like ".." (hard to browse, find online, etc.). > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:29 PM, أحمد حبنكة <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> What do you think about my suggestion in previous reply ? replacing >> List.range with List.(..) operator ? >> >> >> بتاريخ الاثنين، 14 نوفمبر، 2016 2:43:49 ص UTC+2، كتب Max Goldstein: >>> >>> Sometimes it's useful to pass arguments to List.range and have it be >>> empty when a > b. >>> >>> Perhaps there should be List.rangeWithStep 5 1 -1 to solve your problem. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Elm Discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/elm-discuss/z8t8u2f3iWk/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
