On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:23 PM, 'Andrew Radford' via Elm Discuss <
[email protected]> wrote:

> No, it wasn't.  Some parts of the community were aware of it, but calling
> it a community decision is overstating it.


While I wish it were otherwise, my experience from other communities is
that consensus (if that's what you're looking for), or even an attempt at
complete inclusion, in community decision-making is both procedurally
costly and an impediment to progress.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to