I agree with you there. I'm just pointing out that calling this a community decision is misrepresenting things.
On Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:04:27 UTC, Duane Johnson wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:23 PM, 'Andrew Radford' via Elm Discuss < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> No, it wasn't. Some parts of the community were aware of it, but calling >> it a community decision is overstating it. > > > While I wish it were otherwise, my experience from other communities is > that consensus (if that's what you're looking for), or even an attempt at > complete inclusion, in community decision-making is both procedurally > costly and an impediment to progress. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
