Hi,
Consider this:
let
x = 1
in
case something of
x -> (...)
_ -> (...)
The compiler will complain that "The following pattern is redundant",
pointing to the wildcard. I assume that Elm ignores the fact that "x" is
already bound, re-binds it in the first case match and that indeed makes
the wildcard redundant. I know how I would do this in Elixir: I'd put "^"
before "x" to explicitly say not to re-bind the x variable. Is there
something like this in Elm?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
