Thanks for clearing things out! W dniu niedziela, 4 grudnia 2016 02:40:41 UTC+1 użytkownik Michał Podwórny napisał: > > Hi, > > Consider this: > let > x = 1 > in > case something of > x -> (...) > _ -> (...) > > The compiler will complain that "The following pattern is redundant", > pointing to the wildcard. I assume that Elm ignores the fact that "x" is > already bound, re-binds it in the first case match and that indeed makes > the wildcard redundant. I know how I would do this in Elixir: I'd put "^" > before "x" to explicitly say not to re-bind the x variable. Is there > something like this in Elm? >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
