On Friday, December 30, 2016 at 5:34:20 PM UTC, Lourens Rolograaf wrote: > > Please no. Not every Haskell feature should have a place in elm, > especially if there is already a construct that works (and overlaps 100%?) > Please do not make elm2016, elm2017 or coffeeElm, with all kinds of > syntactic sugar because some user from another language still thinks this > way. >
+1 from me. Very much enjoying how Elm is keeping things simple and trying to avoid overlapping features. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
