On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:28 AM, 'Rupert Smith' via Elm Discuss < [email protected]> wrote:
> I said that it might add some complexity or be a little slower but only in > the case where 'attach' is being used. A further observation is that the > extra complexity would only be needed on the first pass - after that, the > client has full ownership of the vdom and could revert to the original > algorithm for updating it. So it _might_ have some impact on the first pass > when using 'attach', it might also work out that the impact is pretty > negligable. Right, but the "impact" in slowness would be made up for in the initial (near instantaneous) client rendering of the server-shipped HTML--so it seems like a good trade-off to me (if the theoretical trade-off exists in the first place :). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
