The thing is that this exact kind of cache (LRU) might not work for all
people, so it'd be great to have barebones interface to
localStorage/sessionStorage/etc. Then higher level abstractions, like
persistent-cache, could be easily built on top of it.

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 at 18:24, Mark Hamburg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Exactly and look at the months old comment at the top of the read me:
>
> NOT RELEASED YET — I hope to release it relatively soon, but I cannot
> make any promises. Until then, please use ports if you want to use
> localStorage.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:22 AM Rex van der Spuy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:07:39 AM UTC-4, Wojtek Piekutowski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  https://github.com/elm-lang/persistent-cache?
>>>
>>
>>  Wow, that's exactly what I need!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Elm Discuss" group.
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Elm Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to