Folks. I feel this thread is maybe not the best place to discuss certain details of topics that raised in discussion. I feel there are too much topic being actively discuss right now and it starts to be pretty hard to follow everything. I feel that understanding what others are talking about is much more important than commenting everything myself but it's really hard to follow everything right now. Anyway I have few points myself. *Please understand that these are points that don't define my whole view.* 1. Interop - First of all it was there but now there is white list for just few packages. Bringing native code especially on lib level is pretty dangerous indeed. On the other hand anyone pulling some hairball (Hickey's term <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rI8tNMsozo0>) he/she has to be aware of certain risks. This is part of contract defined by all OSS licenses I'm aware of. Maybe visible warning + extra confirmation during install would be enough.
2. Elm isn't really "web language". It just happened that current target of Elm is web and that there are certain architectural decision that reflect that. Anyway elm isn't really web technology and in certain ways it's even bending web standards. I don't feel there is a need for Elm to really cover 100% of web standards. Web is very big and loosely defined platform these days used for everything from mail logs to mealtime apps. Elm simply doesn't fit to everything you can do on web. Personally I still have mixed feeling about web component standard. Generally I don't think it's as universally as good idea as some people say. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
