Folks, please stay on topic. If you want to have a discussion regarding special syntax for the different collection types, please start a new thread.
mandag 12. juni 2017 23.52.25 UTC+2 skrev Robert Woodhead følgende: > > Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't this be a situation where a > little syntactic sugar in the compiler would make the medicine go down? > > For example, let's say that := meant "assign with conversion" in Elm. > > In the expression: > > a := b > > the compiler knows the types of a and b, and it knows if there is a > function x of type b -> a, so it could just make the substitution (or throw > an error if a suitable function can't be found). > > So if a is a Dict Int String and b is a List (Int String) then the > compiler would find Dict.fromList > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
