Maybe the effort of changing the version number should be saved to the CVS as some kind of script?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Miles Bader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The problems caused by the current "mess" (21.4 released to mean something else, 22.1 chosen for next release) would have happened regardless of what scheme was chosen (including all of your wacky ones), because what occured is that an extra real release was added in between the last real release and the designated next real release. No amount of futzing around with pre-release names would have changed that. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
