> Cc: Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:10:54 +0100 > > > If `darwin' is the value on some supported system, its omission > > cannot be deliberate, I think. > > Secondguessing will get us nowhere: by that we just cement possible > oversights permanently. Policy by accident, "somebody might have > thought something when doing that", is a recipe for disaster in the > long run. > > AFAICS, Darwin is free software (while MacOSX isn't). So even if we > try to be semi-"politically correct" by deliberately making using > unfree software more complicated with buggy documentation, more likely > window-system rather than system-type should be affected.
Once again David Kastrup pounces on someone guided by nothing else but his own misunderstandings: all I meant to say was that the omission of `darwin' is a bug that should be fixed. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
