"Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Cc: Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:10:54 +0100 >> >> > If `darwin' is the value on some supported system, its omission >> > cannot be deliberate, I think. >> >> Secondguessing will get us nowhere: by that we just cement possible >> oversights permanently. Policy by accident, "somebody might have >> thought something when doing that", is a recipe for disaster in the >> long run. >> >> AFAICS, Darwin is free software (while MacOSX isn't). So even if >> we try to be semi-"politically correct" by deliberately making >> using unfree software more complicated with buggy documentation, >> more likely window-system rather than system-type should be >> affected. > > Once again David Kastrup pounces on someone guided by nothing else > but his own misunderstandings: all I meant to say was that the > omission of `darwin' is a bug that should be fixed.
I apparently mixed up "deliberate" with some synonymon of "arbitrary". Sorry for the confusion. It might have helped if your reply had included a suggested course of action. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
