On Thu, Mar 10 2005, Miles Bader wrote: > Of course the usefulness of Gnus' local binding will have to be > re-evaluated with the new global binding in mind (the old global > binding of M-g was not at all useful for Gnus).
I don't think that goto-line (and friends) are important enough *in Gnus* to change the current `M-g' bindings there. On Thu, Mar 10 2005, Kim F. Storm wrote: > IMO, the gnus M-g binding should definitely be removed in the > *Article* buffer, as is makes good sense to use goto-line to another > buffer based on a file:linenumber found in a mail message (e.g. a > backtrace in a bug report). Wouldn't the "file:linenumber" feature require an absolute filename unless the buffer local value `default-directory' happens to be appropriate? I'd guess that such situations are rare (sender and recipient often have different file locations). > The M-g binding can remain in gnus summary buffers if people prefer... Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel