On Thu, Mar 10 2005, Miles Bader wrote:
> Of course the usefulness of Gnus' local binding will have to be
> re-evaluated with the new global binding in mind (the old global
> binding of M-g was not at all useful for Gnus).
I don't think that goto-line (and friends) are important enough *in
Gnus* to change the current `M-g' bindings there.
On Thu, Mar 10 2005, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> IMO, the gnus M-g binding should definitely be removed in the
> *Article* buffer, as is makes good sense to use goto-line to another
> buffer based on a file:linenumber found in a mail message (e.g. a
> backtrace in a bug report).
Wouldn't the "file:linenumber" feature require an absolute filename
unless the buffer local value `default-directory' happens to be
appropriate? I'd guess that such situations are rare (sender and
recipient often have different file locations).
> The M-g binding can remain in gnus summary buffers if people prefer...
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
