[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs. >> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal >> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you >> would normally like to have for daily work. > > Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too.
--bare-bones seems ok. But things like menus are not "frills", and we don't want to spread that impression. I don't want to get bug reports from people that did not bother using the help menu or tutorial announced on the splash screen because they decided from the manual page that they were not the type of person interested in frills. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
