> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 02:22:26 +0200 > > > I checked and I could not see any difference in behavior compared to the > > approach in my first patch. > > > > Is this OK? > > I am certain I am missing the context, but is this really related to > the #RRGGBB notation in any manner? It really looks awful to me if > white gets defined as #ff00ff00ff00, so I'd like to be as bothersome > as to be grateful for some factual reassurance that we are indeed > catering here for a real instead of a perceived problem, and that the > fix in that manner is the right thing to do.
I'll let Dan answer that. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
