Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Have they signed papers for MH-E only, or general past/future changes > > for emacs as a whole? > > It seems to be a mixture right now. > > How, specifically, does that matter?
Maybe it doesn't, but... If someone has write access to the emacs repository, but only has signed papers for a (small) subset of the code, we need to make sure that person doesn't change things outside the assignments. To me, it seems simpler if people with write access have assigned past/future changes to Emacs as a whole. -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
