> I'd prefer yearly releases of insuperable quality ;-)
Yeah, I do, too. Any idea how can we do that? :-)
> I think it's plain foolish to release a version that is known to be
> flawed. It hurts users and it wastes valuable resources that are at a
> premium on preparing tarballs that would need to be replaced shortly.
>From where I stand, it seems like you are saying that a release is
either perfect, or deeply flawed. That's a pretty strong definition of
"flawed".
> But that's me.
Sure. We're just talking, and venting out a little... :)
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
