On 6/15/05, Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this strengthens my point: do FOR-RELEASE items have to hold > the release, even if we don't know who/when will be able to tackle > them?
The thing is, the trickiest-sounding items in FOR-RELEASE -- those under the "* FATAL ERRORS" section -- also sound like some of the most important. Releasing an Emacs that crashes in recent kernels isn't so nice... [Many of the other items seem not so important to me; I suppose if nobody can be found to fix them, many of those could just be dropped without noticeably decreasing the quality of the release.] -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
