Rather than argue about which common CUA name most closely matches
some Emacs function that we feel we need to expose, a way to truly
proper matches would be to think about how we might modify Emacs --
which we boast to ourselves is so infinitely malleable -- so that it
might present truly CUA-like behavior.I agree with Miles about this. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
