> The code which sets up the escape mappings for those terminals could
> set up an explicit direct mapping for "escape-sequence -> backtab"
> (bypassing the S-tab step) couldn't they?
Except that it would not correctly handle the case where the user has bound
S-tab to something.
The answer is (as has been mentioned on this list a while back) that
terminal-escape-sequences should not be handled with function-key-map but
with a new map placed before function-key-map (and applied unconditionally,
like key-translation-map but unlike function-key-map).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
