David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
XEmacs, after all, does meet the criteria of free software.
Actually and unfortunately, we do not know whether it does.
Certainly, the main authors intend that. But they have not collected
the legal paperwork necessary to prove it to a hostile court.
I agree that
Forcing the maintainers ... to have different distribution paths
...
is wrong. But the sad truth is that legally (although not morally)
the effort is a waste for themselves and others until the very
bothersome legal requirements are met.
--
Robert J. Chassell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
