"Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > XEmacs, after all, does meet the criteria of free software. > > Actually and unfortunately, we do not know whether it does. > > Certainly, the main authors intend that. But they have not > collected the legal paperwork necessary to prove it to a hostile > court.
It shares this property with a large body of free software. Not everybody is as careful as the FSF with regard to copyright assignments. Following your way of reasoning, Linux is a non-free operating system kernel, and we should remove all references to GNU/Linux from Emacs. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
