On 8/4/05, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sascha Wilde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, that is exactly my point, I think Richard is right: > > Linux is just a program "in the usual sense". > > But I was talking about GNU/Linux. It seems you don't even get the > difference we are talking about. [jumping in] Perhaps in a parallel universe you were talking about GNU/Linux. In this universe, you said: > Linux is not really a program in the usual sense. Richard retorted: > It is a program, in the usual sense of the word. > You must have some unusual sense of the word in mind. And you countered: > Looks more like a collection of services to me, somewhat like a library. So definitely you were talking (or at least, you were *writing*) about Linux, not GNU/Linux. I cannot even begin to imagine how could you define GNU/Linux as "a collection of services", or worse, "like a library". God knows I don't have the slightest intention of stopping this little flamewar, but to my eyes, and I think most programmers', Linux is of course a program "in the usual sense" even if it is an operating system kernel too (both things not being mutually exclusive, of course)... -- /L/e/k/t/u _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel